Tommy Sheppard

MP for Edinburgh East

Time to stop being allies of states that oppress women

ballot-box

This month in parliament we celebrated the 90th anniversary of all women being allowed the vote with the passing of the 1928 Equal Franchise Act. This built on the Act a decade before which gave some women – those over 30 and either married or property owners – the vote. Every time we mark these historical landmarks I am struck not by how long ago they were, but by how recent.

The 1920s were an age of modernity. The beginning of commercial air travel, radio and television broadcasting. An Avant-garde in literature, art and music was revolutionising culture. New advances in medicine and technology were being celebrated. And yet most women were denied the right to vote by law. It seems like something from the Dark Ages. It’s quite shocking to think that there are many people alive today who were born in these times.

Universal suffrage had been a long time coming. Prior to the Great Reform Act women weren’t actually denied a vote by law, but since the franchise was extended only to wealthy property owners they were excluded in practice. There are accounts of women with land voting but they are extremely rare.

Throughout the late 18th century political agitation to extend the franchise gathered pace. It’s clear that the debate in the radical friendly societies which sprung up over Scotland and England considered the position of women. Burns was to remark in 1796 that “The rights of women merit some attention”.

By 1832, and at the third parliamentary attempt, parliament passed the Representation of the People Act and there followed the Scottish Reform Act. Both extended the franchise to pretty much all property owners providing they were “male persons”. Now women were actually denied the vote by law.

Bit by bit the franchise was extended further but not until 1918 was the vote given to working class men and some women. It was to take almost a century before women and men were allowed to vote on equal terms.

Thanks to women MPs, and the influence of women voters, legislation passed between 1918 and 1939 dramatically improved the status of women. Inheritance rights were equalised, marriage and divorce laws reformed, the age of consent raised to 16, and widows and orphans’ pensions created.

I doubt that much, if any, of this would have happened if women had not achieved the vote. If ever there was proof that laws reflect the interests of those who make them it is the effect of women’s suffrage.

Votes for women was the beginning of a century of advancement - the fact that women lead both the party of government and opposition in Scotland and we have a gender balanced cabinet are to be welcomed.

But let’s not pretend that the battle is won. Women remain, far too often, at a disadvantage in 21st century Scotland - under-represented in public life and in the running of our society. There’s still a gap in pay and women bear the brunt of Tory cuts in public services whilst having a disproportionate burden of caring for relatives.

This year as we remember milestones in the struggle for equality in the past we should rededicate ourselves to making it a reality in the very near future.

In our determination to achieve real equality most of all our government should use their power to demonstrate solidarity with women across the globe. Maybe it’s time we stopped being allies of countries that don’t treat women as equals and withheld support until women are accorded the basic human rights that their male counterparts enjoy.

Written for Edinburgh Evening News - 19th July 2018

 

Thoughts on the Growth Commission
Should we really be celebrating Westminster's demo...
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Tuesday, 10 December 2019

Captcha Image

Tommy's Blog Articles

Tommy Sheppard
13 September 2019
Tommys Blog
Media
At two minutes past ten on Wednesday morning I was sitting in court number one just behind St Giles on the Royal Mile. A minute later Lord Carloway announced the unanimous decision by the appeal court judges that the British government had acted illegally in proroguing parliament.  There was an audible intake of breath as the decision hit.I was pleased to join my colleague Joanna Cherry QC, and ot...
Tommy Sheppard
09 September 2019
Tommys Blog
My work for you in Westminster
I've had a few emails recently from people who are asking about the SNP position regarding a general election.While I recorded some video updates last week, one of the limitations of social media is that it mitigates against context and nuance, so it is not always an adequate medium to communicate one's ideas. Also, while the instant nature of social media is useful it is limited in a situation li...
Tommy Sheppard
03 September 2019
Tommys Blog
Media
Under the new Prime Minister, the UK’s headlong dash towards the No Deal Brexit cliff edge has accelerated. Johnson makes demands he knows the European Union cannot accept. He demands the removal of the Backstop. The Backstop was designed to protect the Good Friday Agreement and thus peace in Northern Ireland and is, let’s not forget, an international treaty which is overwhelmingly supported by th...
Tommy Sheppard
26 August 2019
Tommys Blog
Media
And so the parliamentary summer recess draws to a close. This week Westminster opposition parties meet to plan their autumn attack. The week after, battle commences in the palace by the Thames. The parliament and the premier, each with a death wish on each other. The question: who will get the killer blow in first?What is clear is that a General Election is coming. Either the government will colla...
Tommy Sheppard
19 August 2019
Tommys Blog
Media
Dearie me, what’s going on in the People’s Party? First, shadow chancellor John McDonnell states that a Westminster Labour government wouldn’t block a request from the Scottish Parliament to hold an independence referendum. He says it twice just in case anyone thinks the first time was a mistake. And this week Jeremy Corbyn says it again to be sure.Now, in one sense, it’s an unremarkable statement...